HOW STARMER IS STRANGLING DEMOCRACY IN THE LABOUR PARTY: by NORMAN THOMAS

Protest outside Labour Party headquarters, London, July 2021: all photos by Guy Smallman

*

Purge

So the purge in Labour goes on. Now they’re kicking out anyone who’s the member of four “poisonous” left-wing groups. I am a member of one of those groups.

Well, no-one could have accused Starmer of hiding what he was about. From the day he got Jeremy Corbyn suspended, it was obvious that he had his sights set on one thing and only one thing: the destruction of the Labour Party he had become leader of.

He had to destroy the Labour Party because under Corbyn it had changed so much. It had gone from under 200,000 members to over half a million. It had become the biggest political party in western Europe.

It had become a party that really believed in the NHS, in fairness in housing and education, in full employment, in world peace, in equality and anti-racism, and in tackling the biggest problem of our times: the threat to the planet. This was a party that was not just paying lip service to these things — but really believed in them.

Neither the establishment in the UK or the US could ever allow the leader of such a party to come near to power in this country or, shudder the thought, even have a role on the world stage.

The early days after Corbyn became leader calmed their worries. With so many of his own MPs in open revolt against him, and the mainstream press finding every trick in the book to demonise him as a friend of terrorists, a Russian spy and, of course, an antisemite, the global establishments told themselves that he wasn’t going to last long. The next election would sweep him to oblivion.

But the next election was in 2017 and, far from sweeping Jeremy Corbyn to oblivion, it brought him within a few thousand votes of parking his rickety bike outside No 10.

Shockwaves shook the establishments so hard that you could almost see the little pieces of the ceilings of palaces and state rooms coming down on the heads of the rich and powerful.

That’s why they redoubled their efforts to discredit the Labour leader. By this time it was clear that the totally unfounded smear of antisemitism was by far the most effective way of dealing with Corbyn. What better way to attack a lifelong campaigner against racism than by accusing him and his allies of racism against Jewish people?

Here Corbyn’s establishment enemies received sterling — and secret — assistance from a fifth column in his own party: the paid bureaucracy charged with maintaining Labour’s disciplinary and organisational systems.

While, in theory, politically neutral, like the civil servants in Whitehall, most of these right-wing characters are in fact dedicated to the dream of one day installing as Labour leader a new Tony Blair — David Miliband? Blair himself? Hugh Grant?

To them, socialism is a dirty word, believed in only by loony Labour volunteers who they call Trots and who they spend their time fighting every which way they can. To these Labour bureaucrats, you don’t have to be particularly radical to be a Trot — just a little to the left of Gordon Brown is enough.

Our Trot-bashing bureaucrats were fighting Corbyn right from the first leadership election that he won so spectacularly, trying to keep his supporters out of the party — and if they did join, trying to stop them gaining influence in the local parties.

Dirty Tricks

But after the scary result of the 2017 election, they went into overdrive, using every dirty trick in the Guinness Book of Dirty Tricks to stop Corbyn-supporting local parties from getting Corbyn-supporting candidates elected to Parliament.

I suffered personally from all this. At the time I was chair of South Thanet Labour Party. After a hard-fought selection process we chose as our parliamentary candidate the exemplary Corbyn-supporting Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt.

We were happy — for about a couple of days. Then we discovered that the Labour Party’s national executive committee (NEC) had decided to withhold its endorsement of Rebecca on the usual — totally spurious — grounds.

We fought for months to get Rebecca endorsed as our candidate, and finally we had to rerun the selection process. Rebecca won again but this time by a much bigger majority.

We hardly had time to celebrate than we were catapulted into the 2019 election campaign. If our shortage of time to prepare wasn’t enough of a handicap, we now found our bureaucrats busily diverting resources and supporters from Thanet to the campaign to keep Rosie Duffield, darling of the right, in her Canterbury & Whitstable seat.

Like so many other Labour candidates who found their own party’s hierarchy tougher opposition than the Tories they were supposed to be fighting, our Rebecca lost.

But it was after Starmer became leader that the attack on the left came out in the open. Starmer stood for leader as the “unity candidate”. He lied. His idea of unity was to kick out everyone except the people who agreed with him.

Expulsions and suspensions rocketed. My partner was expelled for wishing good luck to the Corbyn-supporting MP Chris Williamson. Even saintly Jeremy himself was suspended. The NEC unsuspended him, but Starmer refused to let him back in the Parliamentary party. He’s still not back.

Corbyn’s treatment caused fury in the party — even among many on the right. By the end of 2020, over 70 officers of local parties were suspended simply for allowing their members to debate Corbyn’s punishment beating. Over half of them remain suspended. I am one of them — and proud to be so.

Since then, Starmer’s storm troops have suspended and expelled so many more members. They’ve even suspended whole local parties, such as the neighbouring left-wing parties of East Ham and West Ham. They have rigged and sabotaged and subverted local parties’ annual general meetings — anything to stop the “wrong sort of members” sending the “wrong sort of delegates” to Labour’s national conference. That’s another way of simulating “unity”.

Protest

Now, as I said, they’re banning the groups who have tried to fight back against this onslaught on the left. They’ve started with a handful, but this is just the thin end of the wedge. Many more are in the firing line.

We held a protest against the purge outside Labour Party’s head office in London. Hundreds of members turned out to express their anger about what’s happening. A statement was read out from the film director Ken Loach, a man whose films have offered the most searing exposes of the social justices of our times.

He said: “The destruction of democracy in the Labour party is shameful … Local parties are closed down, their officers replaced or suspended, meetings cancelled … And all this takes place without a word from the mass media. Why? Because Starmer is their man. They know he will change little or nothing. He makes small debating points, but on the big principles – ending privatisation, rights at work, protecting the environment, a foreign policy based on human rights and international law – he is silent …

“He wants a smaller party— with no troublesome activists. This attack on party democracy is driven by a determination to appease the power of the establishment … It is a return to the opportunism and support for corporate power of the Blair years …

“Keep telling the truth of what is happening, it is our strongest weapon!”

The End?

Is this the end for the left in Labour? Is it the end for the Labour Party?

I don’t think so. Not if enough of us fight back, it isn’t. Not if we fight hard enough. Not if we can break the media blackout and get this story to the outside world. There have already been protests outside Labour offices led by suspended members in Bristol and London. But now we need to do much more, and we need the support of all on the left to pull it off.

We need to take direct action to show Starmer up for the cut-price Kinnock he really is: a miserable hitman brought in simply to clear the way for the next Tony Blair. Wherever Starmer goes, every public appearance he or his Parliamentary cronies make, the left needs to go, sticking up for the Labour people he has expelled, suspended or bullied out of the party. We need to shadow him, confront him, speaking out for the socialism Starmer is dedicated to rooting out.

We have to show the world we are the real Labour Party, the true opposition people desperately need to protect them from the Tories. This is our Labour Party: why on earth should we abandon it to an unrepresentative right-wing clique led by an unremarkable idea-free political non-entity?

But this is much more than a struggle inside Labour. This is a battle for the future of left-wing politics everywhere. If we lose, I fear, all the left lose.

If you’re interested in getting involved in the battle for the left, make a date to come to the Rialto Theatre in Brighton on the last weekend in September. There we’ll be holding an alternative Labour Party conference at the same time Starmer’s holding his “official” tea party on the seafront. This could be fun. More details on www.labour-in-exile.org.


Ways You Can Help Whitstable Views:

  • Make sure you share and like our articles on Facebook and Twitter, and whatever other social-media platforms you use.
  • Follow the site to get regular updates about new articles when they appear. Press the “Follow” icon in the bottom right hand corner of your screen and that will take you to the option to sign up. (It disappears as you move the text down, then reappears as you move it back up again!)
  • Leave comments on the site rather than on Facebook. Let’s get a debate going. All of our contributors are willing to engage with you if you leave a comment.
  • To all writers out there, we would LOVE you to make a contribution. Read our submissions page for details on how to go about that: https://whitstableviews.com/submissions/
  • Finally you can donate. As little as £1 would help. Details on the donations page here: https://whitstableviews.com/donate/

6 Comments

  1. Eric Davies

    My view – choices are – socialism meaning direct Government ownership and control of our main service industries including the NHS and Education – or – capitalism meaning direct management and control by companies making money for their share holders nationally and worldwide. I keep asking is Starmer a socialist but still no reply.

    Like

  2. Mary Sullivan

    Great article. Sadly, I don’t think this is a battle the left can win in the Labour Party. Starmer and his cronies in the PLP will make sure of that as the purge continues.

    Like

  3. Norman Thomas

    You’re right that Starmer and his cronies will stitch up the procedural ways we could fight this. That’s why we have to take to the streets and use direct action. And the left both inside and outside the party have to join together in our fight to reclaim the Labour Party. Despite the resignations and expulsions there have never been so many socialists still in Labour. We have to use our numbers to make our cause. We are fighting for socialism and democracy and natural justice.

    Like

  4. lobsterfan

    So let me understand… You don’t like Starmer. You certainly don’t like Tony Blair or Gordon Brown. You don’t like Neil Kinnock. I suspect you didn’t like Milliband either. You don’t like the current party policies. Are you sure that you really want to be in the Labour Party, because you don’t seem to like anyone that is or has been prominent in it apart from the guy who lead the party to almost total oblivion in two attempts? It seems that you wish for policies that were fairly put in front of the British public and which were whole-heartedly rejected. I don’t think this is because they did not understand the Labour platform and policies. I think it is because they didn’t want them.

    Would it not be time better spent to think why the voting public overwhelmingly rejected the party over the last two elections under the guidance of Mr Corbyn. And how they chose a xenophobic, moral-less deceiver with few human values as Prime Minister instead of him. Also, how the Labour Party lost its place in Scottish politics and how it lost half of the north in seats that were Labour for half a century. This did not happen under Starmer’s watch. It happened under Corbyn’s. These would seem to be useful things to debate.

    If you are fighting for democracy as you state, then don’t you have to establish policies that a majority of your fellow citizens democratically want and will vote for. Winning control of government is the job of political parties, no? The views you propose were put to the British people who rejected them roundly. Is there any doubt that they did not? So the choices for Labour supporters seems to be, double down on something that has demonstrably failed and stay out of power or think hard on what might get us elected and what voters find appealing within our beliefs. I know where I stand.

    Like

    1. norm6344

      Your analysis while, apparently logical, fails on two main points. Jeremy Corbyn did fantastically well in the 2017 election and came very close to winning. And in both elections he wasn’t just fighting the Tories, remember, he was fighting the massed ranks of the establishment including nearly ALL the mainstream media (including the Guardian), the majority of his own MPs, and the paid bureaucracy who were actively sabotaging his campaign. Democracy doesn’t work if you can’t get your message across. By the time of the 2019 election the huge forces opposing Corbyn had got their act together and swamped him.

      Your point about Scotland and the North has more weight to it, but you are very wrong to put the losses in these parts of the world down to poor old Jeremy. Labour has been losing votes here for many years for the simple reason the party has historically disgracefully neglected these areas. Labour has taken these voters for granted and from the days of Thatcher left them to cope with the scourge of economic and unemployment. I come from South Wales where Labour neglected their core voters in a similar way. In places like this it’s not so much a question of politicians coming up with attractive policies to get votes as to get voters to believe ANYTHING politicians say, such is the justifiable depth of their cynicism.

      Critically only way to crack that is through a determined grassroots campaign to get round the distortions of the media, rather than adopting the policies that will get the media to give you their favour. Not easy, but it will happen. One day.

      Like

    2. christopherjamesstone

      Scotland has been losing votes to the SNP ever since Blair’s time in office, so you can’t blame Corbyn for that. The Northern constituencies were overwhelmingly Leave voters. It was Starmer’s policy of hitching Labour so strongly to Remain that drove them away (Corbyn was always a Eurosceptic). Starmer has been losing votes by the tens of thousands since he took the leadership: again, not Corbyn’s fault. In 1999 Peter Mandelson told Peter Hain to stop fussing over the working class as they had nowhere else to go. That is a sign of New Labour’s arrogant dismissal of their own core vote. Corbyn was trying to win them back. The 2017 manifesto was actually really popular, hence the surge in votes which bought the Labour Party to within a few thousand votes of winning. No one in public office has been so comprehensively smeared as Corbyn was. Every newspaper, including the supposedly left-wing Guardian, attacked him. Every news channel, including the supposedly impartial BBC. It’s no wonder people turned against him. The question is, if we have to adopt policies that are approved by the billionaire-owned press, we will never be able to put forward a document like the 2017 manifesto again, so what would be the point?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s