ROSIE DUFFIELD’S “BRAND” COLLAPSES: by Julie Wassmer

Why Canterbury Labour supporters can no longer keep silent about their MP

On Sunday 31st May, Rosie Duffield MP became the “Dominic Cummings of Labour”, when it was revealed she had broken lockdown guidelines to pursue her affair with a married man, James Routh, the father of three children.

For many of us who campaigned for Duffield to win this seat for Labour in 2017, this was the final straw. As Eric Segal, a member of Unite and Secretary of the South East Kent Trades Union Council commented: “This is not the time for silence”. I, and many others, agree. The “brand”, carefully constructed by the cabal that still surrounds Rosie Duffield, has collapsed. It’s time for the truth…

In the summer of 2017, Canterbury constituency was ready for political change. Julian Brazier had been the Conservative MP for almost thirty years and, apart from the election of an Independent Unionist from 1910-1918, the constituency held the official record as “the longest uninterrupted period of one party holding a Parliamentary seat”. The Tories had been in power here since 1835.

Labour’s new leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was determined to make a break with the party’s Blairite “red-Tory” past, by pursuing a truly socialist agenda, defined by the slogan “For the Many Not the Few”. This resonated with many people across Canterbury constituency and we came together to show support for Corbyn – and to finally win an election here for Labour.

In my own town of Whitstable, residents offered help with a grassroots campaign run by those who simply desired change and to refute the old adage that “you could pin a blue rosette to a chimpanzee in Canterbury constituency and it would still win.”

Keen to give the lie to the media slurs at that time that Jeremy Corbyn was “unelectable”, I rang friends, neighbours and many other local people I had been in contact with during campaigns to save essential services from Tory cuts, and asked them to help with what became known as the Paint the Town Red campaign. Residents were asked to display Vote Labour posters in their windows or gardens – but, importantly, also to spread the word widely across the whole constituency and thereby increase the amount of red on display.

Fuelled by many social media posts, Paint the Town Red soon caught on and orders for posters flooded in from constituents in both Whitstable and Canterbury. My neighbour constructed a makeshift workshop in his bedroom and nailed posters to stakes every evening after work. I kept a record of names and addresses and handed over staked posters to another resident who delivered and erected them. When we ran out of posters, a contact at Kent University printed more for me. When we ran out of those, I asked residents on social media to be proactive and photocopy their own.

My husband took charge of the orders for massive hoardings from friends with conspicuous homes. One such hoarding dwarfed the Tory poster in a resident’s field on the main Blean road from Whitstable to Canterbury – driven past by thousands every day.

The posters clearly stated Vote Labour.

The Labour candidate’s name failed to appear on them until shortly before the election, but when it did, it was so late in the process we were simply pleased that we had run a successful grassroots campaign. Streets were literally lined with red posters and hoardings – an indisputable sign of support for Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour – and change.

All those who joined the Paint the Town Red campaign were hoping to unseat the Tory MP, Julian Brazier. Having clashed with him many times over what I saw as his lack of support for local people on environmental issues, saving post office services and in opposing the privatisation by stealth of the NHS by his government, I considered his ousting at that time to be a personal mission.

I missed the first hustings event in Whitstable but learned, with great disappointment, that the new Labour candidate, Rosie Duffield, had put in a disastrous performance. The news came not only from residents, but from Duffield herself, after I met her for the very first time, at a public event at Whitstable Labour Club. For a woman who’s a year away from 50, Duffield appears far younger – a naïve ingénue, disarmingly innocent and, at that time – in need of reassurance. I gave it, insisting that future hustings performances could be finessed and that a trusted friend and I would put her in touch with two professional TV actors from our community who had agreed to help coach her.

Duffield’s performance at hustings events improved, though she continued to read from notes, rather than trusting her own ability to speak. During one particular hustings in Canterbury, public support rallied for her when she was accorded victim status after being heckled mercilessly by a local Tory councillor for her heavy reliance on cue cards. Everyone felt sorry for “poor Rosie”…

The image projected at that time for Canterbury’s new Labour candidate was of a single mum, depending on Tax Credits, who had brought up two sons while working desperately hard as a Teaching Assistant.

As Duffield states on her website “I’ve worked as a Teaching Assistant in local schools… As a working single parent, I know the impact of drastic cuts on this area from my own experience. I really understand what life is like for those who need Tax Credits, benefits and decent housing.” 

After she was elected, an article by the teaching union, Unison, continued in the same vein: “Rosie isn’t planning to forget what her life was like…when she had to rely on tax credits and was still struggling to make ends meet, but was working extra, unpaid hours as a teaching assistant because she cared about doing a good job…It was also just assumed that she could stay late and she recalls rushing to pick her son up from school, because she “couldn’t quite afford” after-school clubs, so would have to ask a friend to wait with him till she could get there.”

Poor Rosie…

Demonstrating such dedication in the face of economic hardship and while struggling to bring up two kids alone, Rosie Duffield appeared not only as a brave model for other single mums across the constituency – but for all of us who had been working so hard to get her elected. Amazingly, she had yet another string to her bow – she was involved in writing “political satire”.

As the Guardian reported: “after working as a teaching assistant she moved into political satire writing. She and her writing partners had recently been working on a pilot for a Spitting Image-style puppet show. “It’s cross-political … It’s supposed to be, it tends to be anti-Farage,” she said. “There’s lots of Nigel Farage puppets. Theresa May was just drying.” In light of her unexpected win, the comedy writing is on hold…”

What an amalgam of talents! As Labour supporters we were ecstatic to be helping into power someone with such flair and integrity. But as time moved on, a wider picture appeared of Rosie’s exploits. In the words of one disaffected constituent: “writing political satire? Rosie Duffield is political satire!”

Details began to emerge…Far from being the embodiment of the solid, struggling “working-class single mum” of her election profile, Rosie was actually educated at a small private girls’ school in rural Norfolk. Having performed poorly there, something to which she freely admits: “I was terrible. I played truant a lot,” she left school at 16 and, according to a press article based on an interview she gave to the Kentish Gazette: “In the mid-90s she worked in the City of London and lived with a man, who worked in banking, exposing her to the profit-driven corporate world…Ms Duffield ended her relationship with the banker and moved to Canterbury in 1998.”

She then had two sons (now 21 and 17) and was still living with her partner, Damon Trigger, in Canterbury in 2007, when they both signed a petition from the same address at Riverside Close Canterbury against the extension of opening hours for a local Indian restaurant. Trigger is the New Zealand-born former England cricketer who represented the Kent Cricket Board in List A cricket – but he’s now the sports master at a fee-paying prep school in Kent, Russell House, which charges basic Academic Fees of up to £4,775 per term.

Despite maintaining a staunchly anti-grammar school stance throughout her whole election campaign – Rosie Duffield’s sons both attended a grammar school – something that created a “troublesome position”, as Kirsty Brown described in an article for The National Student in 2017:-

Duffield’s sons were sent by the MP to Simon Langton Grammar School in Canterbury, she was clearly happy to put her own children through a “horrible, devise and stressful” experience so long as it had the potential to advance their academic careers.

Indeed, it seems that although Miss Duffield has claimed that creating grammar schools would be of little importance to the education of thousands of other people’s children, the so called “vanity project” was chosen for her own.

Such revelation has created much debate, with some claiming Miss Duffield was simply choosing the best school available within the current system while others have slammed the MP as both hypocritical and self-serving.

Ultimately, it is absolutely impossible to be anti-grammar schools in principle whilst exercising the ‘right’ to send your children to the same establishments. Either grammar schools are too cruel and backwards to send any child too, or they represent an excellent opportunity for the most gifted and talented students to advance their academic careers and should subsequently be available to those qualified.

Interestingly, the Labour Party recently attempted to support Miss Duffield’s troublesome position in a statement claiming that although an individual “can’t opt out of the system” they can still “disagree with it”, a statement which is neither true nor particularly useful.

If an individual is fundamentally against grammar schools, as Duffield repeatedly claimed to be during her election campaign, they are spectacularly easy to avoid sending your child to. For example, the 11+ exam is in no way mandatory, and as such those who know they wish to attend a non-selective secondary school are under no obligation to sit the examinations. Equally, in filling out their preferences for potential secondary schools no-one is forced to have a single grammar school on their list.”

So, if Rosie wasn’t quite the working class hero(ine) we were initially led to believe, surely her “hardworking Teaching Assistant” credentials still held? Perhaps not…

It wasn’t long after her 2017 election success that news began to circulate, from a trusted union source, that during her time as Teaching Assistant, Duffield had actually been brought before a disciplinary hearing for persistent lateness – and had even arrived late to the hearing. It was also reported that on being advised she was pushing her luck, she revealed her real ambition was to become an MP and, when questioned on policy, she simply restated that ambition…

In fact, persistent lateness and being fired is something to which Rosie freely and casually admits. In an article for Politics Home, she discussed with Marie Le Conte “being perpetually late, getting fired and her hidden comic talent.”

I’m late for everything, all the time, constantly. Always have been…I’ve probably been fired more times than anyone else I know. I mean timekeeping was always a huge issue with me, it’s probably the number one issue. I’ve got friends who literally have this thing called Rosie time, so they know that when we’re meeting for a meal or we’re going out for someone’s birthday, they will build in that half hour, and when I find out I get really cross, even though I know it’s the right thing to do.” 

The news about the disciplinary hearing circulated widely among Labour members and supporters – but we all kept quiet about it – until now. Why did we do so? Why else? For fear of causing damage to Labour as a whole – and Jeremy Corbyn in particular.

It became increasingly clear that Duffield was not all that she had first appeared; a certain amount of “branding” had taken place before and during her election campaign. Rather than an asset, she was actually a liability to a Corbyn-led government. Even worse, any hopes I still harboured that she would, at least, acquit herself as that thing – “a good consituency MP” – were also soon dashed.

Throughout the late summer of 2017, I was contacted by constituents complaining that they were receiving no support, or even replies to correspondence, from their new MP. These included high-profile local figures needing to discuss time-sensitive matters relating to the local Oyster Festival as well as young residents requring urgent help from Social Services and constituents trying to care for sick relatives. In the light of my clear support for Duffield during the election, evidenced in numerous public social media posts, I now felt personally responsible for Duffield’s failure to respond to local people.

From August to November, I wrote several emails, not only to Duffield herself, but copying in other figures within the local Labour party who had been actively promoting her as candidate. It is worth noting at this point that the previous Labour parliamentary candidate, Hugh Lanning, had polled a significant increase in votes at the 2015 general election. As Labour party member and campaigner, Diane Langford, comments: “Crucially, it had been Hugh Lanning who was responsible for making the seat winnable; a fact that would not have gone unnoticed by the South East Region of the Labour Party who, in collusion with a coterie within the CLP, unilaterally decided to install Duffield as the candidate.”

Lanning who had been a highly respected trade union official, and also Chairman of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) since 2009, had stood down as candidate, quite unexpectedly, just before the 2017 election. Shocked local Labour members and supporters had been told that he had decided not to stand, leaving no other candidate than Rosie Duffield. In effect, Duffield’s candidacy had been a fait accompli – and presumed to be the work of Duffield’s Campaign Coordinator, Mike Bland, and his partner, Pat Edwards, of Canterbury CLP who would later become a local city councillor and Duffield’s Election Agent.

On 4th November, I wrote an e-mail (title: Unacceptable Four Month Delay in Replying to Constituents), and sent this to Rosie Duffield, Mike Bland and eight other figures in the local party, cataloguing the dismal failures to reply to constituents. One of those constituents, a disabled resident, had kept me updated regarding the lack of response as follows: “Hi Julie, I’ve still heard nothing off anybody…. I don’t expect to, no one cares…

I wrote as follows to that Labour group: “I’ve now actually lost count of the number of times I’ve written regarding the unacceptable delays in dealing with constituents’ correspondence at Rosie’s office but I have included some of that correspondence at the foot of this email….

I’ve always told everyone I campaign with that the “winning” isn’t difficult – the real challenge is knowing how to deal with the victory. Let’s hope there is another victory next time but, at this rate, I don’t hold out much hope. On a brighter note, (for you anyway), I shan’t be writing again as I won’t be recommending anyone at all to contact their new MP for help. I hope you can see from all that I’ve written that the result is far too disappointing for me – but more importantly – for the constituent.

This time, I received a reply from Duffield herself, acknowledging the delay and apologising: “for the very slow response to correspondence”. She explained that following her election in July, “by September there were 18,000 e-mails in my inbox…Everything was put into a database and given to caseworkers and our constituency assistant, who have been trying to clear that backlog ever since.” Ever since? 18,000 unanswered e-mails??? Yes. Duffield went on to admit: “The delay is embarrassing” but “we are all doing our best to meet the demands of that as best as we can.

What a staggering admission – 18,000 unanswered e-mails in an MP’s inbox. Is that usual for a new MP? I suggested that the very least they could do in that constituency office was to check a few times a week that the automatic acknowledgement for emails was working – but it rarely was.

Since that time, I’ve kept my word never to recommend anyone to write to Rosie Duffield for constituency help – although, in October last year, on the request of Labour Thanet District Councillor, Aram Rawf, I did write to invite Duffield to speak at a Canterbury event to support the Kurdish people in Syria – unsurpisingly, I received no reply…

In July last year, Rosie Duffield came “under fire” from her own local party when she claimed on the Sunday Politics Show that the Labour Party “probably is” institutionally anti-semitic. Canterbury Labour Party chairman, Ben Hickman, duly branded Duffield’s comments as “incredibly reckless” and claimed that they had “angered the “overwhelming majority” of local party members.

Indeed, local members and supporters were furious at Duffield’s unswerving support for those perpetuating the smears of anti-semititism that were constantly being levelled against Jeremy Corbyn. In fact, in September 2018, a censure motion had actually been drafted in a democratic effort by members of the local party to hold Rosie Duffield to account. News of the motion caused a stir in Canterbury CLP and pressure was put on those who had drafted and supported the motion, to withdraw it. The claim was that news of the censure motion might bring negative publicity to the party as a whole, rather than to Duffield personally. The motion was duly withdrawn, at the very last moment, but that failed to prevent someone from Duffield’s camp, exploiting publicity by writing a piece for the New Statesman, describing the motion as a “Dog’s Dinner” and claiming, ironically, that “democracy” had won.

The article appeared the very next day so it must have been worked on the evening before to have met its deadline. Members and supporters felt betrayed.

It was clear that a schism now existed between the Duffield camp at Canterbury CLP and the local Whitstable Labour Party branch which has a proud history of members supporting Palestinian human rights. That breach was only to deepen as time went on…

Some months after Duffield’s electoral success, she became engaged to Michael Anderson – a man she had met “two years ago at a Labour Party meeting”, according to this news story: https://www.kentonline.co.uk/canterbury/news/kent-mp-gets-engaged-days-157324/ Described in the article as “a former Maths teacher”, it appears Anderson, like Duffield’s former partner, Damon Trigger, had also taught at private schools – including Roedean – one of the most exclusive and expensive schools for girls in the country. The Roedean school publication from 2016 also states that Mr Anderson: “taught Maths and worked in boarding at a number of schools including the Duke of York’s Royal Military School Dover and St Edmund’s School, Canterbury”. How prestigious.

Unfortunately, the engagement did not last but in October last year Duffield went on to make a keynote speech in the House of Commons, recounting her experiences of domestic abuse and coercive behaviour from a previous partner.

The speech gained Duffield great sympathy and respect, moving her Labour colleagues to tears. No doubt, Duffield’s 2019 Election Agent,|Pat Edwards, must have given Duffield great support at the time, as she has a longstanding association with the Rising Sun Domestic Violence Abuse Service – of which she is Chair.

Duffield had used her parliamentary voice to speak out and became an inspiring figure for other domestic abuse victims. Notably, in choosing to make this speech in parliament, she effectively muzzled her former partner because “parliamentary privilege” denied him the right to take proceedings (either civil or criminal) against her statements.

Poor Rosie?

Perhaps not. The “victim” is also known as an able abuser by constituents who have witnessed or complained of Duffield’s rudeness on social media. In a tweet (into which she copied Jess Phillips MP) Duffield dismissed a senior member of Whitstable Labour with this stunningly ageist remark:-

As a feminist, politician and working mother, if I suddenly feel the need to consult an old man about my judgement you’ll be the first on my list Wes”.

And after a heartfelt Facebook message to Duffield from Eric Segal, in which he gave a comprehensive account of the tragic loss of his relatives “murdered in the death camps or on the death march out of Auschwitz for the crime of being Jewish”, while entreating Duffield to review her intransigent support for the suspension of Chris Williamson MP for alleged anti-semitism, Duffield issued this dismissive public response: –

Thanks for your important and fascinating contribution Eric, now please do as I asked (as you are clearly a Chris Williamson fan) and unfollow me.”

Duffield also reassured fellow Labour MP, Rachel Reeves, (now Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster) that she would complain to her Regional Director (RD) about a local party member and Palestinian rights supporter, which resulted in the woman, a long-standing Labour member in her 70s, having her personal details exposed on the Politics Home site which left her prey to abuse.

Ironically, it became abundantly clear to many of us who had helped Duffield’s first campaign in 2017, that our MP always seemed to put in her hardest work while trying to discredit Jeremy Corbyn – especially with smears of anti-semitism. Duffield campaigned brazenly on the streets of Canterbury last year alongside her self-proclaimed “friend”, Margaret Hodge MP, who had infamously and shamefully dubbed Corbyn “a fxxxing antisemite and a racist”.

She contributed to the continued vilification of former Labour MP, Chris Williamson, and became the darling – or willing puppet – of Corbyn’s greatest enemy, the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM) – for which you needed to be neither Jewish nor Labour to join, merely perhaps an enemy of Corbyn. At the same time, she refused to listen to the alternative views of many Jewish Labour members within Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) – something which in itself could surely be construed as anti-semitic?

A McCarthyite witch hunt took place within Labour prior to the 2019 election, with local members “shopped” to the party, in effect, for showing support for the Palestinian cause. Diane Langford, a lifelong anti-racist campaigner and Palestine Solidarity Campaign member, was sent no fewer than 39 pages of allegations to be answered within one week, and was sworn to secrecy and warned not to share the news that she was under “investigation” with anyone. “No concrete charges were made,” said Langford, “the trick was that you were supposed to incriminate yourself by responding.”   

Coupled with a full mainstream media onslaught against Corbyn, the election was lost to Labour though Duffield retained her seat by a slim majority. She did so via her collusion with the Remain campaign; forces like the ‘Canterbury For Rosie’ group which had the brass neck to proudly include her in their tweets instructing voters in North Thanet to “tactically” vote Lib Dem – rather than Labour – even though the Labour candidate had polled far more votes in North Thanet in 2017.

The North Thanet Labour candidate, Dr Coral Jones, a campaigning GP who had worked tirelessly to expose, and oppose, government plans to privatise the NHS, is a socialist who supported Jeremy Corbyn. While Duffield’s electoral campaign was awash with funds from Remain supporters – including the Lib Dem peer, Lord Matthew Oakeshott – Labour Party members in Whitstable tried to send a soldarity payment to Dr Coral Jones’s election fund. The donation was blocked, seemingly by Duffield’s Election Agent, Pat Edwards, so my husband, a Labour member himself, wrote to the party and duly received the following reply from the Legal and Governance Department of the Labour Party, confirming that there were no obstacles to such a donation being made:-

From: Legal Queries <legal_queries@labour.org.uk>
Sent: 02 December 2019 13:59
To: j.k
Subject: Donations

Dear Mr K,

Thank you for calling us regarding this query. I can confirm that it perfectly acceptable and not against any electoral regulations for a CLP to give money to a neighbouring CLP. As both CLP’s are official units of the party then the money concerned is simply considered a transfer between party units, and so does not fall any donation restrictions.

Kind regards,

Dxxxx Rxxxx

Governance Officer

The Labour Party

Still, the solidarity payment was never sent.

Ultimately, Rosie Duffield retained her Canterbury seat at the expense of Jeremy Corbyn – the party leader she had so compromised with her alliance and allegiance to his enemies. Throughout the 2019 election, I declared that not only would I refuse to lend a finger to help Duffield’s campaign – I would not vote for her either. While Rosie Duffield remained candidate, I considered myself disenfranchised and decided to exercise a protest vote by spoiling my ballot paper. I suffered online abuse from Rosie Duffield’s supporters for this stance but I never disclosed all that I have now done in this piece because I still did not want to see a Tory back in place in Canterbury. I chose to campaign instead for Dr Coral Jones in North Thanet and Dr Rebecca Gordon-Nesbitt in South Thanet – two excellent hardworking pro-Corbyn Labour candidates. But even then, I was stymied by pro-Duffield forces…

Herne Bay Labour member, Gilbert House, had come to my house to canvass support for Duffield – only to be shown the following explanatory poster in my window.

House then went on to block me from helping a dozen of my friends and fellow Labour supporters with a Super Sunday canvassing day for Dr Coral Jones, writing to me as follows: –

I made a decision to bar you because you have and are campaigning against Labour candidates and if you are a paid up supporter That would be breaking Labour Party rules if you are not a paid up supporter as you are campaigning against a Labour parliamentary candidate that is enough for me to not want to work with you. I am speaking as an individual at this stage and not in any official roll, (sic) but please if you need or want to take this further please make an official complaint to the Labour Party.

Many staunch Labour members and supporters have now left the party – hounded out by unfounded allegations of antisemitism, disappointed with the prospect of more Blairite “red-Toryism” under Starmer – but also thoroughly disillusioned about the person we campaigned for in 2017 – the “brand” that had been presented to us all in Canterbury as Rosie Duffield.

Until now, we have kept silent on most of these details but there has to be an end to the damage Duffield continues to do – no longer to Corbyn – but to the new Labour leader, Keir Starmer. Having rewarded her with a position as Labour Whip, Starmer’s judgement must surely have been called into question when Duffield flouted lockdown guidelines so she could pursue her affair with a married man.

Starmer would also surely have been hobbled in properly holding Cummings to account by having a high profile MP sitting on his front bench who was also guilty of breaking lockdown. Duffield may have resigned her whip’s position but by continuing as MP, she holds on to her £81,950 salary and additional £10,000 for “working from home” during lockdown.

Regarding her own “whopping” expense claims, Shepway Vox reports: “the most expensive MP in Kent for the financial year 2018/19 was Rosie Duffield (Lab). Miss Duffield comes in first claiming a whopping £211,887.63.

On the People Power Index Rosie Duffield is ranked a humiliating 614th out of a total of 650 MPs, based on three criteria: “availability to constituents”, “participation in parliament” and “listening to the public”.

Hardly good value for taxpayers?

But following her resignation from the front bench Duffield writes:-

I will continue to represent the people of Canterbury, Whitstable and the villages as a Labour MP, working hard on all the issues that myself and my team have made positive action on over the past three years.” Does that include 18,000 unanswered e-mails in her constituency inbox, I wonder?

The “ambition” for power is clearly still evident but that’s surely a slap in the face for the real hardworking single mums in this constituency, and elsewhere, who have braved lockdown in all adversity – including the threat of domestic violence?

As one resident commented to me on a social media post:-

The case against Ms. Duffield is that she has both mixed up her personal psychodramas with her politics when it has suited her, and, even more crucially, exhibited a disloyalty to her previous party leader, which can only have contributed to the electoral victory of the Johnson government. Oh, and if you are a lawmaker and representative of the public you do have a duty to public policy above and beyond your personal inclination – no matter if that is inconvenient or would be of no proper interest to anyone but the affected parties, were you a private citizen.

Rosie Duffield’s “brand” has finally lost its sparkle. In fact, it’s thoroughly tarnished. But there’s still time for others, including Keir Starmer, to see the light.

Julie Wassmer

www.juliewassmer.com

Julie Wassmer is a TV drama writer, author and environmental campaigner

Photo by Jon Eldude

DONATE

Like what you read? Please donate as little as £1 to help to keep this site – and independent journalism – alive.

17 Comments

  1. Rocky van de Benderskum

    Wow you’re words are interesting having in them many things I’d already noticed. I was kicked out of the Labour Party during the lead up to Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership campaign for being too loud on social media (my guess) about voting for him, I did try to get an answer as to why but to no avail. No worries it’s no skin off my nose.
    I have only ever actually voted twice in my life, yet I’ve been to every vote I physically could, every other time I’ve spoiled my paper and I do know how unpopular that can make you, again no skin off my nose.
    I voted for myself in 2005 when Chris was my election agent and then again in 2017 which was also a vote for JC (lazy eh?) this last time however I just couldn’t, I did tell people I voted but I actually just wrote BOLLOCKS across the paper like so many times in my life
    Keep writing mate it’s refreshing to read
    You too Chris xx 💚💛❤️

    Liked by 2 people

    1. senora dolores

      Thank you very much indeed, Rocky. I’m very sorry indeed that the Labour Party saw fit to expel you prior to Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership election. This happened to so many people. Another shameful episode of the party trying to thwart democratic choice. I happened to be in the House of Commons to give a talk against fracking around that time and happened to see Harriet Harman in the corridor and tackled her about what I saw to be a scurrilous attempt to silence members’ voices on what kind of leader was needed. They failed in doing that because Corbyn did indeed become leader, but ultimately, the same forces succeeded in his failure to form a government – including all the MPs who colluded with that. Thank you for taking the time to write here, Rocky. I wish you well and I’m really pleased to be in touch with you on social media. Stay safe, stay well. Julie (Wassmer) xx

      Like

  2. Matsands

    Is Rosie open to reason. Her replies quoted seem learnt from Trump’s pressconference playbook/
    Where is evidence Labour is institutionally anti semitic? Could Rosie find it in her notes? Ive found locals who repeat this and I ask for examples they say “well the Jewish Labour Movement says so”.
    The Chief rabbi said Jews in Britain were in fear of a Corbyn government. What are they saved from since we didnt get one?
    Would the Rising Sun Domestic Violence Project and its services be free and unaffected by party political machinations, (I’d hope so) or are you suggesting otherwise?
    Could this diminish the local Labour calls for other parties to withdraw in their favour as the Greens did & LibDem tried to? If we get Proportional Representation for election we wont have the fear of ‘splitting the vote and letting the Tory in’

    Liked by 1 person

    1. senora dolores

      Hi Matt,
      Very many thanks for taking the time to comment on my piece. You raise many important questions. Regarding Duffield and the anti-semitism smears, I wonder if you have read my previous blog on Whitstable Views about this? If not, the link is here: https://whitstableviews.wordpress.com/2019/03/03/whos-pulling-rosie-duffields-strings-on-antisemitism/
      In that, I mention Duffield’s contribution to the vilification of former Labour MP, Chris Williamson, and of Jeremy Corbyn too by her collusion with his enemies. You might also like to read a comment from Chris Williamson himself, just below your own here, on the importance of grassroots action. Take care, Matt. And thanks so much for reading my piece and engaging with it. Much appreciated. Julie (Wassmer) x

      Like

  3. Chris Williamson

    Thanks very much indeed for writing this case study Julie.

    What happened in Canterbury totally vindicates my campaign to democratise the Labour Party, particularly my efforts to make MPs accountable to grassroots members in every constituency through open selections.

    The Parliamentary Labour Party is full of people who are entirely out of touch with their members and the wider electorate, but members have no effective means of holding them to account or replacing them. For those in ‘safe’ seats, it is effectively a job for life.

    One Labour MP even wrote a crass message in a WhatsApp chat group asking if colleagues would contribute to a crowdfunding campaign to have me assassinated! When she discovered that this had been leaked to me she was very apologetic. But she said my Democracy Roadshow was “giving the PLP a collective nervous breakdown”! It’s a curious state of affairs when so-called ‘democrats’ get upset about being subjected to democratic accountability.

    This lighthearted promo video sent the PLP into apoplexy:

    Make no mistake, the smear campaign against me was driven by my democracy campaign. I was told by another MP, who overheard a group of MPs speaking in the Commons tea room, that they wanted me expelled as payback for the ‘Democracy Roadshow’.

    I regret that the Labour Party is lost. Those in charge in the bureaucracy and PLP are not Labour, they’re cuckoos in the Labour nest.

    That is why I am working with others to launch a new grassroots movement. Here’s a link to the website: https://resistfest.co.uk/

    I am hopeful that if we stand together we can still prevail, because together, anything is possible.

    Chris Williamson

    Liked by 4 people

    1. senora dolores

      Dear Chris, thank you so much for taking the time to post a reply about my article on Chris Stone’s site here. This is very much appreciated – as are all your comments – including those about the shocking treatment you received from those who were so scared of – and opposed to – a Corbyn-led government they were prepared to take such horrific lengths to silence and vilify you. Be assured, there are SO very many people who remain supportive of you and confirmed in their belief in your own integrity.
      It gave me no pleasure in writing what amounts to an expose of the false “branding” of a Labour MP, one I wholeheartedly supported, and who then went on to collude with so many of Jeremy Corbyn’s enemies. One would have thought that this would be against party rules, especially since, as I mention in my piece, I, myself, was actually barred from canvassing for an excellent Corbyn-supporting parliamentary candidate, Dr Coral Jones, purely because I had publicly stated I could not vote for Rosie Duffield as I knew her to be a liability for the leader. But such is the current Double Think in play.
      So many good people have now either left the party or been expelled in the McCarthyite witch hunt which you know very well. So many good people, who espouse basic socialist values, find themselves disillusioned and politically homeless.
      have been sharing your own views, Chris, about the need to turn to “grassroots political action”. Any political administration governs only by our consent and I have never lost faith in the power or ordinary people to change things, as long as we maintain integrity – and confidence in our own power.
      I strongly agree with comments of yours ie “We need to organise outside traditional party-political structures. The Panthers achieved this when they organised against the discrimination, poverty and exploitation that communities were facing in the US. In the face of the state’s failure to provide decent services, the Panthers did it themselves. They established community assistance programmes including medical services, free clothing, legal aid and children’s breakfast clubs. The Rochdale Pioneers did likewise. We should aim to replicate these examples to help communities fightback. We also need to resist the Labour Party once again embracing the discredited neoliberal ideology adopted by Miliband, Brown and Blair.”
      I strongly recommend anyone reading my words here to read further about your thoughts on the need for a democratic grassroots movement. They can do so on this link: https://resistfest.co.uk/chris-williamson-makes-the-case-for-a-real-grassroots-movement/
      I wish you well, Chris. Solidarity. Julie (Wassmer) x

      Like

  4. Delia Hazrati

    Great article Julie – my mother(89) and I did campaign for Rosie last year but not again, she does not I believe represent her local party and must go !

    Liked by 1 person

    1. senora dolores

      Dear Delia, thank you so much for taking the time to post a reply about my article on Chris Stone’s site here. This is very much appreciated. I know how hard you have worked locally to try to instigate change here in Canterbury constituency and I think it’s a crying shame that so many of us were, in effect, duped by what I believe to be the false “branding” of a parliamentary candidate. Duffield gained power at a time we longed for positive change under a Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership only to become a liability for him by aligning herself to his enemies. That to me is treachery. Still, I stayed quiet on all I knew for 3 years – though I did write a previous blog about Duffield being a “puppet” for the forces who were trying to falsely brand lifelong anti-racists like Corbyn and Chris Williamson as anti-semites. I’m afraid her cavalier breaching of lockdown guidelines in order to meet with a married lover was the limit for me and I so I refused to stay silent any longer. I wish you well, Delia, and your mum. Best wishes. Julie (Wassmer) x

      Like

  5. Jack T

    Julie, thanks for the background info on the story. Very early on I had suspected Duffield to be a phony. Unfortunately there are many like her in the LP. I was suspended by the Party for unacceptable activity on social media, but I’ve never had any social media presence. When they couldn’t make it stick they changed it to ‘because I campaigned for Chris Williamson’. The bureaucracy of the Party is corrupt and it’s not improving under Starmer who is under the influence of the JLM and the BOD, evident by a ramping up of the witch hunt. Join our ‘Resistance’ group which Chris is promoting.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. senora dolores

      Thanks very much for your reply, Jack, and for the shocking news of your trumped-up suspension. I do strongly urge people to look at more info about Chris Williamson’s grassroots “Resistance” group. I have put a link to it on a reply to a comment from Chris Williamson in this ‘Leave a Reply section’. I strongly believe we must ALL speak truth to power because the party is clearly relying on false suspensions and expulsions to become once more what it was under Blair. It would be interesting to know just how many members Labour now has after this continuing McCarthyite purge. I remained only a paid-up “supporter” of Jeremy Corbyn and ceased my subscription after the last election. But the pattern seems to be for those espousing socialist values or support for Palestinian human rights to be hounded out – and once out, any criticism of the party is deemed to be “sour grapes”. They haven’t been able to do that to me as I never joined – but remained a grassroots campaigner – for Corbyn and against the Tories. That’s how I will remain. I wish you well, Jack. Thanks for your story. Jx

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Jenny King

    Julie Wassmer thank you. The very least I can do, is to share your very honest and brave piece about Rosie Duffield. Thank you for this expośe. Now people know. ~ What they choose to do about it, is of course, up to them, but as Rosie Duffield continues to disappoint (because inevitably she will), they cannot now say that they didn’t know!
    We both know a long-standing Labour member, now in her early 80s, who was treated appallingly by Rosie Duffield and also Rachel Reeves. They both acted in an absolutely shameful way towards this loyal, campaigning, elderly member of the Labour Party because she spoke out in support of the Palestinian people. I had to leave the Labour Party in January 2020 before the latest leadership elections Julie, because it has become such a McCarthyite toxic political party and it has now gone back to being neoliberal “New Labour” once again, just as it was under the leadership of Tony Blair. There is absolutely nothing socialist about the Labour Party at all now. Indeed, the Labour Party considers democratic socialists to be its political enemy! We need a new grassroots democratic socialist movement.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. senora dolores

      Thank you very much for taking the time to make your comment on this site. I have to admit that my piece has not been received very well by supporters of Rosie Duffield and I have suffered some online abuse due to this but what you say completely vinidicates much of what I wrote, particularly this section: “Many staunch Labour members and supporters have now left the party – hounded out by unfounded allegations of antisemitism, disappointed with the prospect of more Blairite “red-Toryism” under Starmer – but also thoroughly disillusioned about the person we campaigned for in 2017 – the “brand” that had been presented to us all in Canterbury as Rosie Duffield.”

      “Until now, we have kept silent on most of these details but there has to be an end to the damage Duffield continues to do – no longer to Corbyn – but to the new Labour leader, Keir Starmer. Having rewarded her with a position as Labour Whip, Starmer’s judgement must surely have been called into question when Duffield flouted lockdown guidelines so she could pursue her affair with a married man.”

      “Starmer would also surely have been hobbled in properly holding Cummings to account by having a high profile MP sitting on his front bench who was also guilty of breaking lockdown….”
      I share your concern and sympathy for the Labour member, now in her 80s, whose personal details appeared on a Politics Home article leaving her open to abuse from extremists.

      As you know, Jenny, a campaigner’s role is to “speak truth to power” but we all have a duty to ensure the truth is exposed in politics. I recognise that I, and so many others, remained silent too long – and I am relieved I finally found the courage to write this piece. Thank you for your support – and your comment. Julie x

      Like

  7. JOE MACVEIGH

    Hello Julie,
    Hope your well during this pandemic.

    I’ve just read your article around Rosie Duffield and felt a personal response appropriate.

    It saddened me to read that once again a CLP has been duped by a prospective Candidate.

    The imposition of candidates is bad enough but when they actually bend the truth regarding their back story to suit their own agenda is morally wrong.

    Unfortunately it would appear it’s becoming the norm that if you are critical of your MP, for whatever reason, then the forces of the Labour Party right wing descend upon that person or CLP (see Wavertree Four) with howls of indignation.

    Anyway I thought the article fair and for what it’s worth Margaret Hodge is not a nice person.

    Good Luck

    Joe (Romford CLP)

    Like

  8. NoBoJo

    Well done, Julie. Rosie has been a terrible MP and her recent actions have been hypocritical and disgraceful. It’s unfortunate to see that her behaviour isn’t anything new and her deceit, laziness and cynical self-promotion are lifelong habits.

    The only place I’d challenge you is on Corbyn. Both things can be (and are) true; Rosie Duffield is a bad MP and Corbyn has a very, very troubling connection to antisemitism. Thankfully he has now gone and is no longer a concern, hopefully the same will soon be true of Poor Rosie. Poor Rosie, the fighter for women’s rights, who merrily destroys the lives of other women on a whim.

    Again, Julie, very brave of you especially knowing how Rosie extremists will react.

    Like

    1. James B

      This is completely incorrect NoBoJo. Corbyn has a connection to Palestinian activism and the BDS Movement. This makes him persona non grata to the establishment as Israel is an extremely dependable and profitable geopolitical ally for US and UK interests in the Middle East.

      On the other hand, Starmer is infinitely more dangerous. As soon as he became Labour leader, he made Wayne David Shadow Minister of State for the Middle East and North Africa. David is a very dangerous hawkish sociopath who voted for the Iraq War, voted against investigations into it, and voted to bomb Libya and Syria. Iraq and Libya are now devastated countries. Starmer did this because he wanted to tell BAE systems and other arms manufacturers that it’s business as usual. It’s also a tacit nod to Israel that Labour’s foreign policy will be very amenable to their interests particularly as David is a prominent member of Labour Friends of Israel.

      He won’t stop foreign wars of aggression either and Labour’s view on Saudi Arabia will undoubtedly change despite the fact that they murder and crucify gay people, use the cat o’ nine tails on rape victims and beheaded a journalist in an embassy. Selling arms export licenses are far more important than poor, brown people in the Yemen. The Labour party has no morals and deliberately hasn’t learnt the lessons of Iraq and other disastrous regime change wars because they’re bought and paid for politicians.

      It’s no coincidence that many in Labour Friends of Israel have prominent positions in the Shadow Cabinet and it’s also not surprising that Pat McFadden and Wes Streeting were schmoozing hedge funders in the City recently. It’s New Labour 2.0 and if they win in 2024, it’ll be laissez faire neoliberal economic policies with a bit more public spending to satisfy the proles and more foreign wars for their donors/establishment. Any commitments to the climate will be quickly forgotten.

      I don’t vote based on tribal loyalties. I vote on what party has an ethical foreign and domestic policy. Labour no longer has one and some of the worst people in the Parliamentary Party have been elevated to positions of responsibility.

      They’ll not get my vote in 2024. Not ever. It’s all academic though as I think Starmer’s Labour has zero chance of winning a GE. In fact, I think 2019 will look like a good GE result in comparison.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s